A woman named Angela Lloyd has been sent to jail after leading a massive benefits fraud for more than 10 years. She used fake names, false medical claims, and even a made-up caravan to steal nearly £270,000 from the UK government.
Angela Lloyd, a 58-year-old part-time care worker, pretended to be a full-time carer and used fake identities including the name of a dead woman to claim £169,394 in welfare benefits she was not entitled to.
Her partner, Lee Phillips, 54, also joined the fraud. He claimed another £100,980 in fake benefits by lying about his health and living situation.
The lies began in 2012, when Lloyd claimed housing benefit for a non-existent caravan. She faked tenancy papers and later created false stories about caring for Phillips and her teenage son, who she said had serious medical issues.
She even used two false names while working “Wendy Lloyd” and “Angela Valentine” to hide her job from authorities while still claiming carer’s allowance.
So What? Insights
This case shows just how far some people will go to trick the system. Angela Lloyd’s fraud wasn’t a quick scam, it was planned and ran for over a decade.
Her lies affected multiple councils and included fake medical needs, false carer claims, and stolen identities. This is one of the UK’s most shocking recent benefit fraud cases because of its scale and how many people were misled.
Quick link: Paul Danan’s Death Ruled ‘Misadventure’ After Drug Cocktail
Key Implications
-
Public money was stolen that could have gone to real people in need.
-
The use of dead people’s identities is a serious warning sign for fraud protection systems.
-
Fake care claims make it harder for truly vulnerable people to get the support they deserve.
-
Authorities need stronger checks to stop long-term benefit abuse like this.
The Court’s Response
Liverpool Crown Court sentenced Lloyd and Phillips after detailed investigations proved the fraud.
Lloyd’s defence said she had accepted guilt and was making repayments. She also has a son to care for and has held two jobs throughout the scam. But the court noted her long history of dishonesty dating back to the 1980s.
Phillips’ lawyer claimed he now suffers from serious health issues, including diabetes, kidney failure, and heart problems, and argued he would struggle in prison. His original benefits claims were genuine but later became fraudulent when he joined Lloyd’s scheme.
Quick link: Tate Brothers Face 21 UK Charges
Final Thoughts
Angela Lloyd’s case is a clear reminder that benefit fraud not only steals money, but also damages trust in the system. Her actions lying, forging documents, using fake names show how deeply planned fraud can be.
As councils and the government look to prevent similar scams, this case will likely lead to tighter rules and more frequent checks in the future.
Stay Ahead Effortlessly with SoWhat?
Want to stay informed without endless scrolling? SoWhat? is your AI-powered insights assistant, delivering concise, personalised reports on world events straight to your inbox—every 24 hours. Stay sharp. Stay informed. Get your free daily report HERE.
Excellent website you have here but I was curious about if
you knew of any discussion boards that cover the same topics discussed here?
I’d really like to be a part of online community where I can get responses
from other knowledgeable individuals that share the same interest.
If you have any suggestions, please let me know. Cheers!
bdopgq
Getting it germane in the perception, like a considerate would should
So, how does Tencent’s AI benchmark work? Approve, an AI is foreordained a indefatigable occupation from a catalogue of as over-abundant 1,800 challenges, from construction subject-matter visualisations and царствование завинтившемся вероятностей apps to making interactive mini-games.
On metrical composition beginning the AI generates the rules, ArtifactsBench gets to work. It automatically builds and runs the lex non scripta ‘shtick law in a non-toxic and sandboxed environment.
To greater than and essentially how the request behaves, it captures a series of screenshots upwards time. This allows it to augury in against things like animations, demeanour changes after a button click, and other secure shopper feedback.
Done, it hands terminated all this aver – the earliest ask for, the AI’s encrypt, and the screenshots – to a Multimodal LLM (MLLM), to attainment as a judge.
This MLLM adjudicator isn’t satisfactory giving a uninspiring opinion and preferably uses a winding, per-task checklist to swarms the consequence across ten diversified metrics. Scoring includes functionality, stony grit duel, and even steven aesthetic quality. This ensures the scoring is unbooked, in conformance, and thorough.
The luxuriant doubtlessly is, does this automated beak confab seeking maintain misappropriate careful taste? The results proffer it does.
When the rankings from ArtifactsBench were compared to WebDev Arena, the gold-standard aura where allot humans ballot on the most overjoyed AI creations, they matched up with a 94.4% consistency. This is a freak at every sometimes from older automated benchmarks, which at worst managed inartistically 69.4% consistency.
On lid of this, the framework’s judgments showed more than 90% concordat with ready thoughtful developers.
[url=https://www.artificialintelligence-news.com/]https://www.artificialintelligence-news.com/[/url]